The effect of the Justification on the difference of Islamic Jurists:
water used to impose purity as a model
Muaffaq dlalia
Iqab Khaled Almhamed
Faculty of Sheikh Nouh Al- Qudah for Shari’ah and Law || W.I.S.E. || Jordan
Tab title this study aimed at explain the opinion of scholars of Islamic jurisprudence on the reasons for which the use of water used for purity is prohibited and the effect of this on the difference of Muslim jurists in the jurisprudence branches These reasons and ills are linked to the purposes of Islamic law, The difference between Muslim jurists in the causes and causes of water used and the jurisprudence that emerged from this difference, One of the most notable findings of this research study was that the reasoning is a defined description of the judgment that includes a legal wisdom disciplined by the purposes of Islamic law. and the agreement of the doctrines of Muslim jurists that the prohibition against the reuse of water used for purity has a legitimate cause and wisdom in Islamic jurisprudence, the difference between Muslim jurists in many jurisprudences on this water is based on reasoning and reason and the nature of this study had to be divided into two parts, the first on the truth of the reasoning among scholars of Islamic jurisprudence and scholars of the purposes of Islamic law. and the second on the explanation of water used in purity and the effect of this reasoning and reason on Muslim jurists Keywords: Water used, water forbidden, water use explained, worshipped, pure water, ablution water for prayer
Tab title
this study aimed at explain the opinion of scholars of Islamic jurisprudence on the reasons for which the use of water used for purity is prohibited and the effect of this on the difference of Muslim jurists in the jurisprudence branches These reasons and ills are linked to the purposes of Islamic law, The difference between Muslim jurists in the causes and causes of water used and the jurisprudence that emerged from this difference, One of the most notable findings of this research study was that the reasoning is a defined description of the judgment that includes a legal wisdom disciplined by the purposes of Islamic law. and the agreement of the doctrines of Muslim jurists that the prohibition against the reuse of water used for purity has a legitimate cause and wisdom in Islamic jurisprudence, the difference between Muslim jurists in many jurisprudences on this water is based on reasoning and reason and the nature of this study had to be divided into two parts, the first on the truth of the reasoning among scholars of Islamic jurisprudence and scholars of the purposes of Islamic law. and the second on the explanation of water used in purity and the effect of this reasoning and reason on Muslim jurists Keywords: Water used, water forbidden, water use explained, worshipped, pure water, ablution water for prayer
أثر العلَّة في اختلاف الفقهاء: استخدام الماء المستعمل أنموذجاً
موفق محمَّد عبده الدَّلالعة
عقاب خالد محمَّد المحاميد
كليَّة الشيخ نوح للشريعة والقانون || جامعة العلوم الإسلامية العالمية || الأردن
Tab title
هدفت هذه الدِّراسة إلى بيان رأي الأصوليين في علل منع استخدام الماء المستعمل، وأثره في اختلاف الفقهاء في الفروع الفقهيَّة، وقد بيَّن الباحثان معنى العلَّة عند الأصوليين وارتباطها بالمقاصد الشَّرعية، واختلاف الفقهاء في علل الماء المستعمل، والتَّطبيقات التي نشأت عن هذا الاختلاف، وكان من أبرز نتائج هذه الدِّراسة تبيين أنَّ العلَّة هي وصف معرِّف للحكم مشتمل على حكمة منضبطة بمقاصد الشَّريعة الإسلامية، واتَّفاق فقهاء المذاهب على أنَّ المنع من استخدام الماء المستعمل معلَّل، واختلاف الفقهاء في كثير من الأحكام المتعلِّقة بماء الطَّهارة ينبني على التعليل، واقتضت طبيعة هذه الدِّراسة تقسيمها إلى مبحثين، الأول حول ماهية التعليل عند الأصوليين وأهل المقاصد، والثَّاني حول علل الماء المستعمل وأثرها عند الفقهاء. الكلمات المفتاحيَّة: الماء المستعمل، منع استعمال الماء، علل استعمال الماء، أديت به عبادة، ماء الطَّهارة، ماء الوضوء.